TheNik
TheNik
93 / 13
22nd Jan 2017
22nd Jan 2017
The VRSG fuel lasts as long as COAL, but burns > 59% hotter, meaning it generates that much more energy, and thus making it that much more efficient than COAL. The only major drawback is that handling VRSG is extremely difficult and dangerous. Enjoy!
fire efficient science fuel efficiency comparison virus coal burn compare

Comments

  • Author
    Author
    22nd Jan 2017
    The VRSG is a gas. it has a larger contact area and more of it burns at any given time.
  • msasterisk
    msasterisk
    22nd Jan 2017
    +1 tho, I like real sicence like this
  • msasterisk
    msasterisk
    22nd Jan 2017
    Perhaps the specific heat of VRSG is just lower than that of coal? If we are going to go by conservation of energy (which is silly in TPT, but eh) then eating coal with virs puts energy into thee system, which doesn't seem right.
  • 08ohib
    08ohib
    22nd Jan 2017
    Awesome! maybe we will see vrsg powered things soon. :)
  • TheNik
    TheNik
    22nd Jan 2017
    Update: Slight changes to the COAL container making the starting conditions more similar. It allowed for more accurate temperature measurements, thus also updated the description to fit the new data.