VRSG is an Efficient Fuel! by TheNik

TheNik

93 / 13

22nd Jan 2017

22nd Jan 2017

The VRSG fuel lasts as long as COAL, but burns > 59% hotter, meaning it generates that much more energy, and thus making it that much more efficient than COAL. The only major drawback is that handling VRSG is extremely difficult and dangerous. Enjoy!

fire efficient science fuel efficiency comparison virus coal burn compare

Comments

• 

  TheNik 23rd Jan 2017
  manhong2112: I see, that proves your claim. Again, if you wish, I may either make this save private or take it down at all.
• 

  TheNik 23rd Jan 2017
  SlazZer: I never claimed it to be either easy to handle or have a high specific impulse in certain rocket drives - the latter of which still can't be found out definitely, as the specific impulse is a very... well, specific number.
• 

  TheNik 23rd Jan 2017
  eden1115: I am not sure what you mean, but if I understood correctly, then you just described the problem I already mentioned in the description.
• 

  TheNik 23rd Jan 2017
  Author: Well, you have a point here. I knew that it regenerates by "eating" the fire and that it's a gas, but I didn't connect these two. Thanks, and sorry for my stupidity.
• 

  manhong2112 23rd Jan 2017
  @TheNik, i don't think i am the first, i just mean maybe someone used it in somewhere, although i also never saw that...btw vrsg is only a part of my save. id:1997427
• 

  SlazZer 23rd Jan 2017
  The truth 2094231
• 

  eden1115 23rd Jan 2017
  but how can u store the gas instead of gravity pumps or diamonds
• 

  Self_Destruct 23rd Jan 2017
  That reminds me... whenever somebody makes an "impenetrable" wall, I just make a VIRS bomb and light it on fire. Lol.
• 

  CTpyromaniac1337 23rd Jan 2017
  The only difference between virus and virus gas is just that. One's a gas. They both act the same. Except the fact that virus gas burns.
• 

  Author 22nd Jan 2017
  @TheNik VRSG assimilates the fire as it is burned. If it did not do this it would all burn up incredibly fast.